• About Us
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Send Us a Tip
Menu
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Send Us a Tip
CyberNews logo
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Editorial
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Resources
Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Editorial
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Resources
CyberNews logo

Home » Editorial » How you’re reacting to coronavirus depends on the social media platform you use

How you’re reacting to coronavirus depends on the social media platform you use

by Chris Stokel-Walker
25 March 2020
in Editorial
0
man with face mask and smartphone
0
SHARES

It’s impossible to escape discussion about the coronavirus. Wherever you go online, discussions are dominated by the spread of COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, with social media users swapping tips, tricks and information – as well as varying levels of accurate advice – about its spread.

But a new paper by Italian researchers shows that what may at first seem like a unified, global conversation is actually very disparate, with different platforms focusing on different parts of the coronavirus issue.

A team of nine academics have analysed the way information about COVID-19 is spread and shared on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, and Gab. The team looked at more than eight million comments posted over 45 days since the existence of coronavirus first caught the attention of the world. They also analysed user engagement and interest around the coronavirus.

How they did it

The team monitored key terms around the coronavirus, based on Google Trends’ related queries, covering phrases and words like “pandemic” and “Wuhan”. They found nearly 3.4 million users had posted comments about coronavirus-related issues across the different social platforms.

What the researchers found was interesting: on Reddit and YouTube, discussions revolved primarily around the death toll and rising number of infection rates. On Twitter, the main topic of discussion was the suspension of suspended flights and repatriation, as well as the economic impact and advice on how to protect yourself against the spread of the virus.

Instagram was different: the main discussion points on the photo-sharing platform, accounting for nearly half of all interactions the researchers measured there, was focused on the “Chinese crisis”. 

On Gab, the social media platform established after Twitter was accused of censoring extreme viewpoints, more than half of the discussions measured by the researchers revolved around the unfolding crisis on the Diamond Princess, the cruise ship that was a crucible for infection, and the notion that the spread of the virus was the result of biological warfare.

Reddit has in-depth conversations

The number of different topics discussed also shines some light on the makeup of each platform’s users. Redditors managed to cover 19 different areas, including the censorship of the Chinese internet by tech giant Tencent to try and stifle news about the coronavirus escaping from China. Perhaps expectedly, Instagram had the least in-depth analysis of the subject, focusing mainly on advice on how to protect yourself, the mounting death toll, and comparison with other viruses.

“Gab is the environment more susceptible to misinformation diffusion,” the researchers write, but “information marked either as reliable or questionable do not present significant differences in their spreading patterns.”

Social media struggles with real news

The findings support previous research that demonstrates that on social media, fake news travels faster, further and deeper than real news. That research, conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), tracked stories and how they spread on Twitter.

But not all social networks are created equal. While Reddit’s unreliable posts accounted for just 5% of the reliable posts about coronavirus shared on the platform, 7% on YouTube, and 11% on Twitter, it was much higher on Gab – 70%, according to the research.

And those posts were reacted with much more than ones containing reliable information on Gab. The volume of engagements with questionable content is 270% greater than the engagement with reliable content.

“Our analysis suggests that information spreading is driven by the interaction paradigm imposed by the specific social media or/and by the specific interaction patterns of groups of users engaged with the topic,” the authors say.

ShareTweetShareShare

Related Posts

Is there life on Mars?

Is there life on Mars?

22 January 2021
Woman using VR glasses

Why Businesses Are Preparing for an Extended Reality (XR)

21 January 2021
Satellites are not safe enough. Here’s why that should worry you

Satellites are not safe enough. Here’s why that should worry you

21 January 2021
Hacked image on mobile

Here are the biggest digital heists of the last decade

19 January 2021
Next Post
cybercriminals

The sophisticated business strategies of the modern cybercriminal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Popular News

  • 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers

    70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers

    83031 shares
    Share 83021 Tweet 0
  • 8 best cybersecurity podcasts for 2021

    56 shares
    Share 56 Tweet 0
  • Facebook is tracking you: learn how to delete all Facebook data

    56 shares
    Share 56 Tweet 0
  • How to find what Google knows about me and get back my privacy?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Most common passwords: latest 2021 statistics

    381 shares
    Share 381 Tweet 0
Elon Musk

Elon Musk to offer $100 million prize for ‘best’ carbon capture tech

22 January 2021
Is there life on Mars?

Is there life on Mars?

22 January 2021
Covid-19 vaccine

Covid vaccines are now an excuse to launch phishing attacks

22 January 2021
Alphabet shutting Loon, which used balloon alternative to cell towers

Alphabet shutting Loon, which used balloon alternative to cell towers

22 January 2021
what is wireguard

WireGuard protocol: everything you need to know

22 January 2021
Parler loses bid to require Amazon to restore service

Parler loses bid to require Amazon to restore service

22 January 2021
Newsletter

Subscribe for security tips and CyberNews updates.

Email address is required. Provided email address is not valid. You have been successfully subscribed to our newsletter!
Categories
  • News
  • Editorial
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Resources
  • VPNs
  • Password Managers
  • Secure Email Providers
  • Antivirus Software Reviews
Tools
  • Personal data leak checker
  • Strong password generator
About Us

We aim to provide you with the latest tech news, product reviews, and analysis that should guide you through the ever-expanding land of technology.

Careers

We are hiring.

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Send Us a Tip
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Vulnerability Disclosure

© 2021 CyberNews

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Policy.

Home

News

Editorial

Security

Privacy

Resources

  • In the News
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Send Us a Tip

© 2020 CyberNews – Latest tech news, product reviews, and analyses.

Subscribe for Security Tips and CyberNews Updates
Email address is required. Provided email address is not valid. You have been successfully subscribed to our newsletter!