Age verification laws causing discord in Linux community, with multiple users forking systemd
New laws requiring operating systems to verify users’ age are giving the Linux community more reasons to divide. On GitHub, multiple forks of systemd are appearing after the fundamental Linux system component added a field to store the user’s birthdate.
Image by Cybernews.
New laws requiring operating systems to verify users’ age are giving the Linux community more reasons to divide. On GitHub, multiple forks of systemd are appearing after the fundamental Linux system component added a field to store the user’s birthdate.
Systemd is the first Linux process that runs on boot, responsible for start up and service management. Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora – most major Linux distributions rely on it.
While it had its share of controversies in the past due to ever-expanding scope, a mutiny has now started over a recent decision by maintainers to yield to changing laws over age verification. The component itself does nothing with the data.
Systemd now includes an optional birthdate field in the user record file for age verification purposes.
The code proposal was submitted on March 5th, 2026, by a developer who argued that various utilities are implementing their age verification solutions and need a data source for the user’s age.
More from Cybernews
Sainsbury’s installs more facial rec tech in stores: Should shoppers be worried?
"Phantom squatting” uses AI hallucinated domains for cyber attacks
What they’re doing to gamers is a robbery in broad daylight
Irish parliament expands Microsoft use, despite the EU’s efforts to ditch it
Can government AI actually scrub UAP footage from the internet?
The EU and Apple CEO Tim Cook held "constructive" talks after their Siri AI dispute in Europe
The discussion became so heated that systemd had to lock it. Nevertheless, the proposal was approved last week by a maintainer who states in their profile that they work at Microsoft.
Unsurprisingly, the move wasn’t taken lightly. Multiple privacy-oriented projects, including GrapheneOS, Artix, and Omarchy, refused to implement age verification.
Now multiple forks of systemd are popping up on GitHub, dissecting the newest additions as a protest form. They all convey a clear message.
“This is systemd but without the age verification,” one of the fork's descriptions reads.
“Age verification is not a joke or some minor inconvenience. It is the first step to forcing compliance in open-source operating systems like Linux. Don’t allow it, don't merge or develop things to follow unclear laws. We have to fight this,” another developer said, promising to support their fork.
Some forks dissecting the birthdate field include slurs, and even challenge California to sue them.
The most popular fork, described as “Liberated systemd -- no surveillance. Ever,” now has over 330 stars and is submitted by AI researcher Jeffrey Seathrún Sardina.
“Mass surveillance is bad, actually,” the developer explains.
They went further to post the mirror on Codeberg and Gitea “in order to allow users to avoid MicroSlop’s ecosystem.”
“Microslop” is a derogatory nickname for GitHub’s owner, Microsoft, coined recently due to the company’s tendency to include unwanted AI features in its products. The company unsuccessfully tried to silence the meme.
The opposition to age verification laws extends even further. One user proposed to revert the “birthdate” field addition. However, his proposal was rejected.
“It’s an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized if people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional,” the maintainer explained.
“Please move your discussion elsewhere, you are misunderstanding what systemd does here. It enforces zero policy, it leaves that up for other parts of the system.”
Users on GitHub are already listing open source projects. One of the Linux distribution lists can be found here.
A new Linux distribution, Ageless Linux, was created with a sole promise to never ask a user’s age, even when legally required.
The conversation on this topic is live. Join in the discussion.
Over 400 security and privacy researchers and scientists from 30 countries have recently signed an open letter warning that proposed online age verification laws are ineffective, privacy invasive, deepen inequality, and can be easily bypassed while lacking evidence that they benefit minors.
The key laws requiring operating systems to collect users’ birthdates come from California and Colorado, with January 2027 as their effective date, and Brazil, where enforcement has already begun.
The new laws mandate that OSes transmit the age signal to app stores in real time, to gate what applications users can download.
Unlock more exclusive Cybernews content on YouTube.