Coinbase just said non-technical teams are now shipping code, and crypto users are terrified

It was supposed to be just another announcement by a major crypto exchange about AI-driven layoffs. But one line raised questions about the platform's security and the billions in crypto assets custodied by Coinbase.

The line that is still among the most quoted is this: "Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated."

"The pace of what's possible with a small, focused team has changed dramatically, and it's accelerating every day," Coinbase CEO and co-founder Brian Armstrong said in an email to employees about the company's decision to fire around 14% of its staff.

This escalated quickly as the exchange's users grew worried about further data leaks from the platform, while others reminded that Coinbase is a custodian of billions of dollars' worth of bitcoin (BTC). These are stored on behalf of major companies in both the traditional and crypto sectors, including the world's largest asset manager, BlackRock, and the biggest BTC treasury company, Strategy.

"Non-technical teams are now shipping production code" at the company responsible for custody of almost 15% of the bitcoin supply," @mononautical summarized.

"The last thing you want to hear the CEO of a financial-services firm say is 'Non-technical teams are now shipping production code,’ veteran business journalist and book author James Surowiecki added.

"Genuinely terrifying lol, already had my data leaked enough before this," @MonetSupply reacted.

As reported by Cybernews a year ago, Coinbase disclosed a major cybersecurity incident that exposed sensitive user data, while its users were reportedly losing tens of millions of USD worth of crypto assets per week to social engineering scams.

Armstrong addressed these worries, claiming that "all AI-generated code has rigorous human reviews" and that no one is vibecoding directly to production.

"We're increasing the speed of shipping and innovation, while continuing to raise the bar on security," the CEO explained, but the social media crowd didn't buy it.

Commenters argued that non-technical teams can't conduct "rigorous human reviews," that reviewing code takes longer than writing it, and that the company might end up hiring its engineers back.

"You are not reviewing code, just building more tests and guardrails to try to contain unknown code. Playing russian roulette with people's keys," @Gabezor concluded.

Unlock more exclusive Cybernews content on YouTube.