France slaps €750,000 fine on Vanity Fair magazine for placing cookies without consent
-
-
Contribution by
Jonathan Rolland
The French data protection authority, CNIL, imposed a €750,000 ($869,000) fine on the publisher of Vanity Fair magazine in the country for placing cookies on user devices without proper consent.
Even the “Reject all” button did not work.
CNIL says that a prominent fashion and culture magazine, vanityfair.fr, placed cookies on user devices as soon as they arrived on the website, before interacting with any consent banner.
The €750,000 fine is levied on the company LES PUBLICATIONS CONDE NAST, which publishes the printed and online magazines in France.
The investigations began after a public complaint from the association noyb in December 2019. In July 2022, the proceedings were closed after the company received an order to comply. However, further investigations revealed that the company had failed to comply with the obligations of the French Data Protection Act (Article 82).
This legislation requires websites to clearly inform users and obtain their prior consent before storing or accessing any non-essential cookies or trackers on their devices.
“The amount of this fine takes into account the fact that the company had already been issued with an order to comply, as well as the number of people affected and the various breaches of the rules protecting users with regard to cookies,” CNIL said.
The watchdog outlined several bad practices through which the Vanity Fair publisher failed to comply with the law:
- Vanityfair.fr failed to obtain user consent before placing cookies. The website placed cookies on the devices as soon as visitors arrived on the site, even before interacting with the information banner to express a choice.
- Information provided to users lacked clarity. Some cookies were incorrectly labeled as “strictly necessary,” without providing any useful information about their purposes, and allowing them to bypass the consent requirement, despite serving tracking or advertising purposes.
- Refusing mechanisms were ineffective. When users clicked the “Refuse all” button in the consent banner or decided to withdraw their consent to have trackers installed on their device, the website still placed new cookies, subject to consent obligations. Present cookies also remained active
The CNIL emphasizes in the decision that the fine is high in part because Conde Nast had already been issued a formal notice in 2021, but failed to correct its practices.
According to the decision, the company acknowledged violations but cited technical errors, blamed the Internet Advertising Bureau's (IAB) Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF) for misleading information, and stated that the cookies in question fall under the “functionality” category. The company claimed good faith and cooperative efforts, and also argued against the publicity of the sanction.
Unlock more exclusive Cybernews content on YouTube.
