We may earn affiliate commissions for the recommended products. Learn more.

NordVPN vs Mozilla VPN: compared in 2024

NordVPN and Mozilla are both very familiar names. NordVPN is a wildly-popular VPN that has extended its reach into other cybersecurity solutions. Meanwhile, Mozilla is most famous for its Firefox browser but also offers other products like VPN.

And, VPN is the crossroad where the two providers meet and battle it out. Here, NordVPN has the advantage of pedigree as well as advanced security and robust features. Meanwhile, Mozilla VPN boasts great performance and is powered by Mullvad. But, some have complained about its sparse features and high price tags. Plus, it’s a newbie in an already-established market.

So, is NordVPN the ultimate winner in the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN comparison? Or, will Mozilla VPN surprise us all?

Well, this review should help to answer those questions. Let’s find out how NordVPN and Mozilla VPN stack up in terms of performance, pricing, security, features, and more.

NordVPN vs. Mozilla VPN comparison

NordVPN dominates the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN comparison. For starters, NordVPN is available worldwide while Mozilla VPN is available in around 30 countries. Plus, despite NordVPN’s cheaper pricing, it has over 10 times more servers and multiple protocol options while Mozilla VPN stuck to only WireGuard.

Besides its better streaming capabilities, it also allows 6 simultaneous connections, which is one more than Mozilla VPN. As for customer support, NordVPN is more accessible with its 24/7 live chat while Mozilla VPN has neither 24/7 nor live support options.

NordVPNMozilla VPN
⭐ Rating:
🥇 Overall rank:#1 out of #42#18 out of #42
🖥️ Servers:6,300 + servers in 111 countries500 + servers in 30 countries
📖 No logs policy:No logsNo logs
💵 Price:From $3.09/monthFrom $4.99/month
🔥 Coupons:NordVPN coupon 74% OFFCybernews VPN Coupons
🔒 VPN protocols:OpenVPN, IKEv2/IPsec, WireGuard (NordLynx)WireGuard
🍿 Streaming services:Netflix, Hulu, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, and moreNetflix US, 9Now, and more
🖥️ Platforms:Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOSWindows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, Firefox
📥 Simultaneous connections:105
💁🏻 Support:Knowledge base, FAQs, email, 24/7 live chatKnowledge base, FAQs, email

Netflix and streaming capabilities

There’s not much of a NordVPN vs Mozilla VPN contest when it comes to streaming capabilities as NordVPN reigns supreme for very simple reasons. First, NordVPN is amazing at bypassing geo-restrictions — even notoriously sophisticated geo-blocks like those imposed by Netflix.

In contrast, Mozilla VPN struggles to unblock most streaming services. We succeeded in bypassing Netflix US and 9Now’s geo-blocks using Mozilla VPN but that’s about it. It failed to unblock other regions’ Netflix libraries as well as other streaming services like Hulu, Disney+, and HBO Max.

PlatformNordVPNMozilla VPN
Netflix✅ US, UK, Canada, Germany, Japan, other.✅ Only Netflix US
Amazon Prime Video
Disney +
BBC iPlayer

NordVPN offers SmartDNS technology that lets you unblock geo-restricted content even on platforms that don’t support VPN apps natively, such as certain smart TVs and game consoles.

Wrapping up
NordVPN is an absolute winner when it comes to streaming. This VPN unblocks all of the popular streaming platforms, so you never run out of content to watch.

Plans and pricing

Both have very straightforward pricing schemes. Either way, you’ll see a lower price if you pick a longer subscription period. Plus, both providers also come with a 30-day money-back guarantee, so you can try them out risk-free.

NordVPNMozilla VPN
MonthlyFrom $12.99
1-year plan From $4.59/month$4.99/month
2-year planFrom $3.09/monthN/A

Their monthly plans are the only exception here. Billed monthly, NordVPN costs 12.99 while Mozilla VPN is cheaper at $9.99. However, that’s a steep price to pay considering the limited features included.

Price tags aside, a NordVPN subscription covers up to 10 simultaneous connections while Mozilla VPN allows only up to 5 connections. It might not seem like a significant difference but it’ll surely minimize the risks and inconveniences that stem from not protecting all your devices.

In brief, NordVPN is a significantly cheaper option. Looking at their best deals, NordVPN costs only $3.09/month while Mozilla VPN will set you back $4.99/month.

Wrapping up
While Mozilla VPN offers just one subscription plan, NordVPN has more flexibility and more plans to suit different needs. It covers up to 10 simultaneous connections and various payments options.

NordVPN vs Mozilla VPN: which is more secure?

NordVPNMozilla VPN
EncryptionAES-256-GCM and ChaCha20AES-256-GCM and ChaCha20
RAM serversYesNo
A member of the 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes AllianceNoYes
No-logs policyAuditedAudited
Kill switchYesYes
Ad blockerYesYes
DNS leak protectionYesNo

Security and privacy are at the core of all VPNs, so it’s great that NordVPN and Mozilla VPN take them seriously. Between the two, NordVPN is more secure.

Both NordVPN and Mozilla VPN use advanced encryptions and offer some very handy additional security features, such as a kill switch and DNS leak protection.

However, NordVPN has the lead because it uses RAM-only servers for guaranteed privacy. Additionally, it also escapes the danger of surveillance and intelligence-sharing since it operates under the jurisdiction of Panama. Plus, NordVPN has been rigorously audited in multiple areas, including its no-logs policy.

Meanwhile, Mozilla VPN has a few things going against it. For starters, it’s only starting to transition to RAM-only servers. It’s also based in the US, which isn’t exactly privacy-friendly.

And, while it has been audited, it’s only on one occasion by Cure53 and the firm found two medium vulnerabilities and one item of great concern.

In brief, taking into account their infrastructure, approach to privacy, and logging policies, NordVPN is the more secure provider.

Wrapping up
NordVPN wins over Mozilla VPN in terms of security, as it operates on RAM-only servers, has a strict no-logs policy, and has undergone several independent audits that confirm the top-class security requirements.


NordVPN uses RAM-only servers, which have a few advantages in terms of security, performance, and agility. Security-wise, there’s no hard drive to store data like usage logs. Plus, all data stored on RAM-only servers is wiped upon each reboot. This means that a remote reboot can be initiated in case of a breach to protect anonymity and privacy.

As for Mozilla VPN, it’s noticeably silent in this aspect. However, Mullvad VPN has started expanding its diskless (RAM-only) infrastructure to more locations. And, since Mozilla VPN uses the same infrastructure, it’s logical to assume that it’s also in the process of making the switch to RAM-only servers.


The two VPNs use next-gen AES-256 and ChaCha20 for encryption. Both algorithms are the gold standards in the industry and will keep you safe. NordVPN and Mozilla VPN’s main difference, however, lies in their tunneling protocols.

NordVPN supports three protocols and leaves the ultimate decision in your hand. It offers:

  • NordLynx. NordVPN’s proprietary protocol is based on WireGuard. Fast and using cutting-edge cryptography, the protocol is great for streaming and gaming.
  • OpenVPN. It runs on either TCP or UDP internet protocol. It’s often regarded as the best protocol for privacy because of its strong encryption.
  • IKEv2/IPSec. Fast and secure, this protocol is mobile-friendly and has great network-switching capabilities.

In contrast, Mozilla VPN offers only WireGuard, which is great for optimizing performance because of its streamlined code. However, the one-or-nothing approach means that you’ll be left hanging if it can’t connect to your network. Plus, it’s also worth noting that WireGuard is still vastly considered to be experimental at this point.


NordVPN and Mozilla VPN pledge that your data will not be logged. However, NordVPN wins this round of Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN because it backs up that claim with independent audits.

NordVPN has undergone three public audits by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) and the firm confirmed its no-logs policy. VerSprite also audited the provider on multiple occasions, too. Plus, it also operates under the jurisdiction of Panama, which isn’t in the 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes, and 14-Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance.

In contrast, Mozilla VPN has nothing much to offer in this regard except for claims that it has a strict no-logs policy. You either have to take its word for it or pass on it. Unfortunately, the fact that it’s based in the US – which is right smack in the middle of the alliance – doesn’t help its case in appearing as privacy-friendly, either.

Speed comparison: NordVPN vs Mozilla VPN

In the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN performance comparison, NordVPN has a slight lead since it’s a tad bit faster and better for a few reasons. First, NordVPN provides more options by offering three different protocols — NordLynx, OpenVPN, and IKEv2/IPSec. You’ll see the fastest results with its proprietary NordLynx, which is built around WireGuard.

Beyond that, its sprawling network of 6300+ servers in 111 countries is also significantly more than what you get with Mozilla VPN. That’s good news for speed since, generally, you’ll see faster results if the server is close to your location.

Meanwhile, Mozilla VPN offers only one protocol: the lightning-fast WireGuard. However, if you take a look at our VPN speed test tool, you’ll see that WireGuard, though incredibly fast, still comes in second to NordLynx. Plus, depending on your location, Mozilla VPN’s small server fleet could also be detrimental to speed.

Overall, you can expect great speeds from both NordVPN and Mozilla VPN. However, between them, NordVPN is faster — especially if you’re using its NordLynx protocol.

Features overview

NordVPN wins the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN feature comparison hands down. An extremely robust provider, NordVPN covers the basics without fail and exceeds expectations with additional advanced features.

In contrast, Mozilla VPN’s feature lineup is on the slimmer side. While it has added to its collection of tools since its debut, the VPN still lacks certain notable features.

NordVPNMozilla VPN
Split tunneling
Kill switch
Specialty servers

Split tunneling

Split tunneling is an extremely helpful feature that lets you choose which apps need VPN protection and which ones that can connect directly. This control means that you can decide when to prioritize security and when to put speed first. It also eliminates the inconvenience of having to disconnect from the VPN when you want to access the internet directly.

nordvpn split tunneling feature

Unfortunately, both providers don’t support split tunneling on macOS and iOS. Instead, they support the features only on Windows and Android. Linux users also get split tunneling with Mozilla VPN.

Kill switch

NordVPN and Mozilla VPN also come with the indispensable kill switch, which disconnects your device from the internet in case your VPN connection drops. This helps to shield your IP address and location as well as keep your other details safe.

NordVPN’s kill switch works perfectly and you even have the options of a system-wide kill switch (disable all Internet access) or an app kill switch (disable only specific apps). Unfortunately, the latter isn’t available on Linux and Android.

NordVPN Kill Switch option

Similarly, Mozilla VPN also has a kill switch, which is enabled by default. There’s also no option to turn it off, which is helpful to prevent accidental deactivation but could be a pain if the kill switch malfunctions.


The duo also throws in ad-blocker in their packages. In NordVPN’s case, you get Threat Protection to avoid cyber threats like malware and trackers. This feature plays a few roles — including blocking ads and trackers, scanning files before downloads, identifying threats, and preventing visits to potentially malicious websites.

Likewise, Mozilla VPN’s ad-blocker blocks annoying pop-up ads and protects your devices against online threats. You can even tweak the level of protection among standard, strict, and custom. However, note that users have complained that it’s not usual for the strict level of protection to block legitimate windows, which isn’t ideal.

Mozilla VPN advanced DNS settings

Other features

Besides the above features, both NordVPN and Mozilla VPN have more to offer. Between them, NordVPN has a significantly longer list of additional features.

Some noteworthy NordVPN features include:

  • SmartDNS. It lets you unblock geo-restricted content on platforms that don’t support VPN apps.
  • Specialty servers. This includes double VPN/multi-hop where your traffic is sent through two servers instead of one for an additional layer of security and privacy, onion over VPN combines your connection with The Onion Router (Tor) network for added privacy and to avoid heavy surveillance, and a dedicated IP feature, which gives you a unique and fixed IP address.
  • Dark web monitor. It scans the dark web and alerts you if your personal information is found.
nordvpn-servers 1

As for Mozilla VPN, its honorable mentions include:

  • Multi-account containers. It separates different activities into different tabs to boost privacy.
  • Multi-hop. This feature routes your activity through an entry VPN server and then through an exit VPN server for extra privacy.
Wrapping up
NordVPN tops as a more feature-rich option compared to Mozilla VPN. It includes more functionality in terms of specialty servers, a kill switch, streaming capabilities, and more. Overall, NordVPN's additional features win over most other VPN providers.

Server locations

NordVPNMozilla VPN
Servers6300+ 500+
Virtual locationsNoNo
Specialty serversMultipleDouble VPN (multi-hop)

It’s another easy victory for NordVPN in the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN server locations faceoff since it has more servers and also covers more ground with servers in 111 countries. Meanwhile, Mozilla VPN has 10x fewer servers at just 500+ servers in 30 countries.

Moreover, NordVPN also has multiple specialty servers, which contrasts sharply with Mozilla VPN’s sole addition of double VPN.

In brief, NordVPN made a clean sweep with its extensive servers all around the world as well as its multiple specialty servers.


Both VPNs support torrenting but NordVPN has an advantage yet again. To start, you can torrent on all of its servers. However, its dedicated P2P servers are optimized for torrenting and will have no problem handling large transfers of data. This translates to better speeds. Plus, NordVPN also comes with SOCKS5 proxy, which offers faster download speeds.

As for Mozilla VPN, it doesn’t offer much information about its torrenting capabilities and methods. However, since it’s piggybacking off Mullvad’s network, we can deduce that it’s similarly P2P-friendly.

Platforms, interface, and ease of use

NordVPNMozilla VPN
Supported OSWindows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOSWindows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, Firefox
Other software and devicesKodi, Android TVs, Fire devices
Browser extensionsChrome, FirefoxFirefox
Simultaneous connections105

NordVPN and Mozilla VPN support all the major operating systems on the market. However, that’s where their similarity ends, and NordVPN speeds ahead in the Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN comparison.

For starters, NordVPN also supports other software and devices like various smart TVs as well as browser extensions for both Chrome and Firefox. Additionally, it allows up to 10 simultaneous connections.

In stark contrast, Mozilla VPN doesn’t support any other platforms beyond the main ones. Meanwhile, its browser extension might be free but it’s only available on Firefox. Plus, it only allows up to 5 simultaneous connections.

Desktop apps

NordVPN’s desktop apps are easy to use, modern, and intuitive for Windows and Mac users. However, you don’t get a visual interface if you’re on Linux.

NordVPN connected Netherlands

Its Windows app is the most functional one and comes with all the features. Meanwhile, for macOS, it has two apps: one from the App Store and the other from its website. The former supports all tunneling protocols while the website version is considered a sideload that only has OpenVPN. However, the latter has more features.

Although they look the same, Mozilla VPN’s Windows app is more functional than its Mac app. You get all the features on Windows but not even split tunneling on Mac. And, just like NordVPN, you only get the command line on Linux.

Mobile apps

NordVPN and Mozilla VPN’s mobile apps are responsive, clean, and easy to navigate. However, as usual, both NordVPN and Mozilla VPN’s Android apps have more features than their iOS counterparts.

In NordVPN’s case, its Android app is packed with features like a kill switch, split tunneling, and Auto-connect. You also get OpenVPN and NordLynx protocols with the app. Meanwhile, its iOS version houses fewer features but has the advantage of allowing IKEv2, OpenVPN, and NordLynx protocols.

nordvpn mobile apps

As for Mozilla VPN’s mobile app, it’s far less functional. However, you’ll still find features like server selections, split tunneling, and a kill switch. Just bear in mind that its iOS app is even more sparse and doesn’t support split tunneling.

Customer support

NordVPNMozilla VPN
24/7 live chat

Email / Ticketing system

Guides or articles


NordVPN is undeniably the victor of this round of Mozilla VPN vs NordVPN since its team is available to help 24/7 via live chat. Alternatively, email support is also available. It has tons of guides, articles, and FAQs, too, if you prefer a more DIY approach.

As for Mozilla VPN, your best bet is to hit up its help center for relevant articles and guides. Otherwise, you could also send an email but be prepared for a long wait for answers. Obviously, this is far from ideal when security is at stake.

NordVPN vs Mozilla VPN – which one wins?

CategoryNordVPNMozilla VPN
Server locations
Ease of use
Customer support

Overall, NordVPN is the better VPN. Fast, secure, and feature-rich, the provider offers it all at a competitive price point. Aside from that, it also has an extensive selection of servers and is great for both streaming and torrenting.

Unfortunately, Mozilla VPN pales in comparison. Despite its strengths in certain areas, the provider’s weak points, like its small fleet of servers and poor streaming capabilities, are too great to overlook.

More VPN comparisons:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are markedmarked