Kick vs. Twitch: the battle of the streaming titans


Kick and Threads are ripping up the rulebook, sparking a tech clone war, and reshaping the digital engagement landscape. Will these transformative platforms redefine the future or simply reiterate the past?

Navigating the relentless pace of technological change, it's clear we're living in an era where change is the only constant in our digital lives. Unexpectedly yet fascinatingly, we've seen phenomena like generative AI emerge from obscurity into ubiquity, altering the contours of our digital interactions. Similarly, millions have recently flocked to Threads, Meta's infamous rival to Twitter.

Passionate online communities have highlighted Zuckerberg's strategic incursions into established digital territories as shady at best. From the integration of TikTok's dynamic Reels feature to the adoption of Snapchat's immersive Story function, the concept of paid Blue Ticks, and the encapsulation of the entire Twitter platform – it seems like the tech titan is assembling a mosaic of the best in social media.

However, in gaming circles, a new live streaming service called Kick is on a mission to dethrone iconic Twitch as the platform of choice to stream their content and watch others play video games. Kick has secured 10 million accounts in 7 months. But could this remarkably similar live-streaming platform be another signal of a new tech clone war?

Introducing the streaming platform attracting millions of gamers

Kick is the new live-streaming platform dominating conversations amongst the passionate gaming community. It offers features similar to the usual suspects Twitch, YouTube Live, and Facebook Live. Online audiences can seamlessly subscribe to their favorite creators' channels, send tips, and engage with them in real-time. But Kick stands out from other platforms because of its 'creator-centric' approach at a time when many believed Twitch was heading in the wrong direction.

A backlash against Twitch erupted due to the platform's newly imposed advertising rules, which were perceived as a direct threat to streamers' livelihoods. Being an Amazon-owned live-streaming service, Twitch had planned to limit the scale and category of ads utilized by its content creators. This change significantly constrained streamers' revenue generation, inciting concern and frustration.

The creators' discontent led to threats of platform boycotts and actual migrations to alternative platforms. Despite Twitch retracting these policies, some creators argue that not all the new rules have been fully reversed, disputing Twitch's official statement. A tweet encapsulating the community's sentiment, deeming the new rules "bad for you and bad for Twitch," struck a chord, amassing 24.3 million views.

Kick accused of copying Twitch and poaching users

Predictably, recent events created a perfect opportunity for a power play by Kick. The buzz surrounding the new platform has been escalating, thanks mainly to its successful acquisition of Amouranth and xQc, two of the most prominent figures from Amazon's Twitch platform.

Kick is strategically introducing a tempting revenue model for its content creators. The platform currently allows creators to retain a mouthwatering 95% of their subscription earnings while offering more creative freedom with less moderation. This is a significant leap compared to Twitch's 50% and YouTube's 70%, presenting an appealing financial proposition for creators. This generous share of subscription revenue is an enticing offer and a clear signal of Kick's commitment to a creator-centric approach.

It's a strategic maneuver that not only fuels the migration of streamers to Kick but also stimulates discussions around fair revenue practices in the streaming industry. The back-to-back switch of Amouranth and xQc to Kick in particular stirred up controversy in the streaming landscape. Reports suggest that xQc was lured with a lucrative deal approximating $100m. But when combined with the wave of smaller streamers enticed by the promise of a heftier share in revenue, it's easy to see why it's Kick grabbing all the headlines.

Why content creators are flocking to Kick

While Kick's creator and user base is currently smaller than its established competitors, it grants an unusually wide reach for each piece of content, a feature reminiscent of the early days of many successful social media platforms. As these platforms grow, they often lose this broad reach, making Kick's current advantage compelling Twitch users to migrate.

On Twitch, gaining a large following can be a long grind, especially given the platform's increasing saturation. However, Kick offers an accelerated path to prominence, a prospect enticing many. Small streamers on Twitch often grapple with visibility amidst a sea of established channels, making the prospect of moving to a less congested platform like Kick highly appealing. Greater visibility and the promise to keep 95% of subscription earnings make it difficult for gamers to ignore Kick.

As the curtains rise on platforms like Kick and Meta's Threads, we’re arguably witnessing the birth of a transformative approach that clones the best aspects of established platforms, but infuses them with more innovative, disruptive, and equitable business models. Is this the silent drumroll to an epic tech duel, igniting a fresh era defined by mimicry as a form of strategic competition?

There is a strong argument that we’re at the precipice of a tech clone war. If so, this battle might not only redefine the tech landscape but also shape the future of how we engage with digital platforms and put the power back in the hands of the content creators.


More from Cybernews:

Book review: neurotech aims to read your mind – and more

Ukraine supporters targeted by malware ahead of NATO summit

Subscribe to our newsletter